Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views :
NEWS SMART

Here you will find everything about smart and technology

Sen. Warren On Big Tech, Manafort & Trump Admin’s 'Pre-Bribe' | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC

/
/
/
76 Views

>>> JOINING ME NOW IS SENATOR >>> JOINING ME NOW IS SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN DEMOCRAT FROM ELIZABETH WARREN DEMOCRAT FROM MASSACHUSETTS AND A 2020 MASSACHUSETTS AND A 2020 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

THANKS FOR BEING HERE THANKS FOR BEING HERE >> THANK YOU >> THANK YOU I’M DELIGHTED TO BE HERE

I’M DELIGHTED TO BE HERE >> YOU HAVE CRITICIZED A LOT OF >> YOU HAVE CRITICIZED A LOT OF BIG BANKS BIG BANKS TODAY YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT TODAY YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT BREAKING UP BIG TECH BREAKING UP BIG TECH

WHY? WHY? >> SO HERE’S THE DEAL >> SO HERE’S THE DEAL WE NEED REAL COMPETITION IN THIS WE NEED REAL COMPETITION IN THIS FIELD FIELD AND THERE’S A PROBLEM

AND THERE’S A PROBLEM SO AMAZON, GOOGLE, THEY OWN A SO AMAZON, GOOGLE, THEY OWN A PLATFORM WHICH IS PRETTY COOL PLATFORM WHICH IS PRETTY COOL WHERE EVERYBODY COMES TO BUY AND WHERE EVERYBODY COMES TO BUY AND SELL OR TO DO THE SEARCHES SELL OR TO DO THE SEARCHES

AND AT THE SAME TIME, THEY OWN A AND AT THE SAME TIME, THEY OWN A BUNCH OF BUSINESSES THAT ARE BUNCH OF BUSINESSES THAT ARE COMPETING WITH ALL THOSE FOLKS COMPETING WITH ALL THOSE FOLKS WHO ARE COMING, SAY, TO AMAZON WHO ARE COMING, SAY, TO AMAZON IN ORDER TO SELL THEIR GOODS IN ORDER TO SELL THEIR GOODS AND THEY DON’T JUST COMPETE AND THEY DON’T JUST COMPETE STRAIGHT UP STRAIGHT UP THEY COMPETE BY BEING ABLE TO THEY COMPETE BY BEING ABLE TO KEEP ALL OF THE INFORMATION FROM KEEP ALL OF THE INFORMATION FROM EVERY ONE OF THOSE COMPANIES

EVERY ONE OF THOSE COMPANIES AND THEN DECIDE, OH AND THEN DECIDE, OH I’M GOING AFTER YOU AND YOU AND I’M GOING AFTER YOU AND YOU AND I KNOW HOW MUCH TO CHARGE AND I I KNOW HOW MUCH TO CHARGE AND I KNOW WHAT KIND OF VOLUME TO KP KNOW WHAT KIND OF VOLUME TO KP PT PT

IT’S A LITTLE LIKE BEING AN IT’S A LITTLE LIKE BEING AN UMPIRE IN BASEBALL AND OWNING A UMPIRE IN BASEBALL AND OWNING A TEAM TEAM MY VIEW IS YOU CAN DO ONE, BE AN MY VIEW IS YOU CAN DO ONE, BE AN UMPIRE, OR THE OTHER, OWN A UMPIRE, OR THE OTHER, OWN A TEAM TEAM BUT YOU DON’T GET TO DO BOTH AT BUT YOU DON’T GET TO DO BOTH AT THE SAME TIME

THE SAME TIME >> YOU WANT TO REGULATE SO THEY >> YOU WANT TO REGULATE SO THEY DON’T JUST FAVOR THEMSELVES DON’T JUST FAVOR THEMSELVES YOU DROPPED THIS PLAN TODAY YOU DROPPED THIS PLAN TODAY

THIS IS YOUR FIRST BIG TV THIS IS YOUR FIRST BIG TV INTERVIEW ABOUT IT INTERVIEW ABOUT IT LET’S LOOK AT SOME OF THE LET’S LOOK AT SOME OF THE RECEPTION TODAY RECEPTION TODAY >> ELIZABETH WARREN IS GOING >> ELIZABETH WARREN IS GOING AFTER BIG TECH COMPANIES

AFTER BIG TECH COMPANIES >> WARREN BREAKING UP AMAZON, >> WARREN BREAKING UP AMAZON, GOOGLE, AND OTHER TECH GIANTS GOOGLE, AND OTHER TECH GIANTS >> THIS IS THE TOUGHEST PLAN >> THIS IS THE TOUGHEST PLAN WE’VE SEEN TO DATE FROM ANY OF WE’VE SEEN TO DATE FROM ANY OF THE CONTENDERS THE CONTENDERS

>> HER HUGE SHAKEUP IN THE TECH >> HER HUGE SHAKEUP IN THE TECH SECTOR SECTOR >> IT’S BIG AND BOLD >> IT’S BIG AND BOLD >> COULD SHE REALLY FORCE THIS >> COULD SHE REALLY FORCE THIS KIND OF BREAKUP? KIND OF BREAKUP? >> COULD SHE REALLY DO IT? >> COULD SHE REALLY DO IT? >> YOU BET

>> YOU BET >> WHAT’S THE ANSWER? >> WHAT’S THE ANSWER? >> THE ANSWER IS YES >> THE ANSWER IS YES LET’S BE REALLY CLEAR ABOUT LET’S BE REALLY CLEAR ABOUT THIS THIS

IF YOU STILL WANT TO BE ABLE TO IF YOU STILL WANT TO BE ABLE TO SEARCH FOR COFFEE POTS AND LOOK SEARCH FOR COFFEE POTS AND LOOK AT 63 CHOICES AND GET THE ONE AT 63 CHOICES AND GET THE ONE THAT’S GOING TO BE THERE IN 48 THAT’S GOING TO BE THERE IN 48 HOURS, YOU CAN STILL DO THAT HOURS, YOU CAN STILL DO THAT AS A CONSUMER AS A CONSUMER THIS PRESERVES THE PLATFORM

THIS PRESERVES THE PLATFORM IF YOU STILL WANT TO GO ON IF YOU STILL WANT TO GO ON GOOGLE AND FIND OUT THE CAPITAL GOOGLE AND FIND OUT THE CAPITAL OF NORTH DAKOTA, YOU CAN TOTALLY OF NORTH DAKOTA, YOU CAN TOTALLY DO IT DO IT WHAT THIS IS ABOUT IS ABOUT WHAT THIS IS ABOUT IS ABOUT COMPETITION COMPETITION

IT’S ABOUT ALL THOSE LITTLE IT’S ABOUT ALL THOSE LITTLE BUSINESSES AND START-UP BUSINESSES AND START-UP BUSINESSES AND ENTREPRENEURS WHO BUSINESSES AND ENTREPRENEURS WHO WANT TO PUT THEIR PRODUCTS ON WANT TO PUT THEIR PRODUCTS ON AMAZON OR ON GOOGLE AND WHO ARE AMAZON OR ON GOOGLE AND WHO ARE AT AN ENORMOUS COMPETITIVE AT AN ENORMOUS COMPETITIVE DISADVANTAGE DISADVANTAGE BECAUSE AMAZON OR GOOGLE DECIDE BECAUSE AMAZON OR GOOGLE DECIDE TO GO INTO KOMPL TIS WITH YOU TO GO INTO KOMPL TIS WITH YOU AND PUT THEIR PRODUCT ON PAGE AND PUT THEIR PRODUCT ON PAGE ONE AND YOUR PRODUCT BACK ON ONE AND YOUR PRODUCT BACK ON PAGE SIX PAGE SIX AND KILL YOUR BUSINESS

AND KILL YOUR BUSINESS >> LET’S GO THROUGH SOME OF >> LET’S GO THROUGH SOME OF THESE COMPANIES SO WE CAN ALL THESE COMPANIES SO WE CAN ALL UNDERSTAND UNDERSTAND YES OR NO AND THEN WE’LL GET YES OR NO AND THEN WE’LL GET INTO THEM INTO THEM

>> SURE >> SURE >> DO YOU VIEW THEM AS OPERATING >> DO YOU VIEW THEM AS OPERATING MONOPOLIES? MONOPOLIES? GOOGLE GOOGLE >> GOOGLE, YEAH

>> GOOGLE, YEAH PRETTY MUCH — PRETTY MUCH — >> AMAZON? >> AMAZON? >> OH, YEAH >> OH, YEAH CAN WE JUST DO ON AMAZON — CAN WE JUST DO ON AMAZON — >> FACEBOOK >> FACEBOOK

>> YEAH >> YEAH >> APPLE >> APPLE >> YEAH

>> YEAH >> OKAY >> OKAY SO LET’S LOOK AT FACEBOOK FIRST SO LET’S LOOK AT FACEBOOK FIRST AND WE’LL GO THROUGH EACH OF AND WE’LL GO THROUGH EACH OF THEM THEM

MR ZUCKERBERG DISAGREES WITH MR ZUCKERBERG DISAGREES WITH YOU YOU TAKE A LOOK

TAKE A LOOK >> IS TWITTER THE SAME AS WHAT >> IS TWITTER THE SAME AS WHAT YOU DO? YOU DO? >> IT OVERLAPS WITH A PORTION OF >> IT OVERLAPS WITH A PORTION OF WHAT WE DO WHAT WE DO >> YOU DON’T THINK YOU HAVE A >> YOU DON’T THINK YOU HAVE A MONOPOLY? MONOPOLY? >> IT CERTAINLY DOESN’T FEEL >> IT CERTAINLY DOESN’T FEEL LIKE THAT TO ME LIKE THAT TO ME

>> OKAY >> OKAY >> IS HE WRONG? >> IS HE WRONG? >> YES >> YES BECAUSE HE HAS THE FACEBOOK BECAUSE HE HAS THE FACEBOOK PLATFORM

PLATFORM THAT’S THE KEY PART HERE THAT’S THE KEY PART HERE SO IF YOU WANT TO CHECK ON WHAT SO IF YOU WANT TO CHECK ON WHAT YOUR COLLEGE ROOMMATES ARE UP YOUR COLLEGE ROOMMATES ARE UP TO, YOU GOT TO GO TO HIS TO, YOU GOT TO GO TO HIS PLATFORM PLATFORM

AND THE PART THAT GETS ME AND I AND THE PART THAT GETS ME AND I REALLY WANT TO DESCRIBE IT THIS REALLY WANT TO DESCRIBE IT THIS WAY, MONOPOLY POWER IS THAT SO WAY, MONOPOLY POWER IS THAT SO MANY FOLKS HAVE GOT TO COME TO MANY FOLKS HAVE GOT TO COME TO HIS PLATFORM TO BE ABLE TO HIS PLATFORM TO BE ABLE TO TRANSACT TRANSACT HE WANTS TO BE ABLE TO SELL ADS, HE WANTS TO BE ABLE TO SELL ADS, FOR EXAMPLE, ON THAT FOR EXAMPLE, ON THAT THE PROBLEM IS HE’S SCOOPING ALL THE PROBLEM IS HE’S SCOOPING ALL THIS INFORMATION UP — THIS INFORMATION UP — >> FACEBOOK IS YOUR ARM IN THIS >> FACEBOOK IS YOUR ARM IN THIS ANALOGY? ANALOGY? SO THIS IS THE FACEBOOK

SO THIS IS THE FACEBOOK >> THAT’S RIGHT >> THAT’S RIGHT >> THEN WHAT GOES ON IT? >> THEN WHAT GOES ON IT? >> WHAT HAPPENS IS HE USES ALL >> WHAT HAPPENS IS HE USES ALL THIS INFORMATION AND THEN MAKES THIS INFORMATION AND THEN MAKES THE DECISIONS ABOUT HOW TO SCOOP THE DECISIONS ABOUT HOW TO SCOOP UP OTHERS IN THE MARKETPLACE UP OTHERS IN THE MARKETPLACE

FOR EXAMPLE, HE RUNS A BUY AND FOR EXAMPLE, HE RUNS A BUY AND SELL FOR ADS SELL FOR ADS SO HE’S IN EVERY POSITION ON SO HE’S IN EVERY POSITION ON THAT THAT A BUYER OF ADS, A SELLER OF ADS, A BUYER OF ADS, A SELLER OF ADS, AND RUNNING A LITTLE PLATFORM AND RUNNING A LITTLE PLATFORM WHERE THOSE ARE SOLD

WHERE THOSE ARE SOLD THAT JUST CREATES AN ENORMOUS THAT JUST CREATES AN ENORMOUS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND HERE’S THE PROBLEM AND HERE’S THE PROBLEM

ON EVERY ONE OF THESE ON EVERY ONE OF THESE THESE ADVANTAGES ARE NOW SO THESE ADVANTAGES ARE NOW SO ENORMOUS THAT VENTURE ENORMOUS THAT VENTURE CAPITALISTS ARE STARTING TO SAY, CAPITALISTS ARE STARTING TO SAY, WAIT A MINUTE WAIT A MINUTE IF YOU’RE GOING TO GO INTO A IF YOU’RE GOING TO GO INTO A SPACE WHERE YOU COULD IN SOME SPACE WHERE YOU COULD IN SOME WAY BE CHALLENGING AMAZON OR BE WAY BE CHALLENGING AMAZON OR BE CHALLENGING FACEBOOK OR BE CHALLENGING FACEBOOK OR BE CHALLENGING GOOGLE,ING THE NOW CHALLENGING GOOGLE,ING THE NOW REFERRED TO AS THE KILL ZONE

REFERRED TO AS THE KILL ZONE AND VENTURE CAPITAL HAS GONE AND VENTURE CAPITAL HAS GONE DOWN DOWN BY ABOUT 20% OVER THE PAST FIVE BY ABOUT 20% OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS OR SO BECAUSE THEY’RE JUST YEARS OR SO BECAUSE THEY’RE JUST SAYING IT DOESN’T MAKE ANY SAYING IT DOESN’T MAKE ANY SENSE SENSE

>> SO IF YOUR PLAN IS ENACTED, >> SO IF YOUR PLAN IS ENACTED, DO EACH OF THOSE COMPANIES GET DO EACH OF THOSE COMPANIES GET SOMEWHAT BROKEN UP? SOMEWHAT BROKEN UP? >> SO WHAT THEY GET IS THE >> SO WHAT THEY GET IS THE PLATFORM GETS BROKEN OFF FROM PLATFORM GETS BROKEN OFF FROM THE INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES THE INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES THAT’S ALL I’M SAYING THAT’S ALL I’M SAYING YOU CAN STILL USE THE PLATFORM

YOU CAN STILL USE THE PLATFORM >> YOU’RE SAYING IT’S GOOD FOR >> YOU’RE SAYING IT’S GOOD FOR CONSUMERS? CONSUMERS? >> IT’S EXCELLENT FOR CONSUMERS >> IT’S EXCELLENT FOR CONSUMERS BECAUSE IT NOT ONLY MEANS THE BECAUSE IT NOT ONLY MEANS THE PLATFORM WILL BE LEVEL PLATFORM WILL BE LEVEL

YOU’RE NOT GETTING SOMETHING YOU’RE NOT GETTING SOMETHING FROM AMAZON PUSHED OUT IN FRONT FROM AMAZON PUSHED OUT IN FRONT OF YOU OF YOU AND A BETTER COMPETITOR HIDDEN AND A BETTER COMPETITOR HIDDEN BACK ON PAGE SIX BACK ON PAGE SIX IT ALSO MEANS THE NEXT GOOD IDEA IT ALSO MEANS THE NEXT GOOD IDEA HAS A CHANCE TO MATURE

HAS A CHANCE TO MATURE >> RIGHT >> RIGHT THAT AMAZON JUST LIKE EVERYONE THAT AMAZON JUST LIKE EVERYONE REMEMBERS WITH BOOK SELLERS IS REMEMBERS WITH BOOK SELLERS IS NOT GOING TO BE KNEECAPPING NOT GOING TO BE KNEECAPPING EVERYONE EVERYONE

YOU’RE HERE ANNOUNCING THIS YOU’RE HERE ANNOUNCING THIS TONIGHT AND CAMPAIGNING IN LONG TONIGHT AND CAMPAIGNING IN LONG ISLAND CITY WHERE AMAZON JUST ISLAND CITY WHERE AMAZON JUST PULLED OUT PULLED OUT IS THAT DELIBERATE? IS THAT DELIBERATE? >> YOU BET IT’S DELIBERATE >> YOU BET IT’S DELIBERATE >> WHAT ARE YOU SAYING? >> WHAT ARE YOU SAYING? >> WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT IS HOW >> WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT IS HOW BIG THESE TECH GIANTS HAVE BIG THESE TECH GIANTS HAVE GOTTEN

GOTTEN SOP THAT WHAT WE SEE AND WE SAW SOP THAT WHAT WE SEE AND WE SAW THERE ON LONG ISLAND CITY IS THERE ON LONG ISLAND CITY IS THEY COME IN, THEY BULLY TOWNS, THEY COME IN, THEY BULLY TOWNS, CITIES, STATES ALL AROUND THE CITIES, STATES ALL AROUND THE COUNTRY COUNTRY YOU KNOW, THE HANDFUL OF TECH YOU KNOW, THE HANDFUL OF TECH GIANTS HAVE GOTTEN MORE THAN $10 GIANTS HAVE GOTTEN MORE THAN $10 BILLION IN BREAKS FROM TOWNS AND BILLION IN BREAKS FROM TOWNS AND CITIES AND STATES OVER THE PAST CITIES AND STATES OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS FEW YEARS

>> CORPORATE WELFARE >> CORPORATE WELFARE >> THAT’S RIGHT >> THAT’S RIGHT >> IS THAT A PROBLEM WITH THE >> IS THAT A PROBLEM WITH THE INCENTIVES OR WAS NEW YORK WRONG INCENTIVES OR WAS NEW YORK WRONG TO GIVE THEM THAT MUCH OF AN TO GIVE THEM THAT MUCH OF AN OFFER? OFFER? >> THE PROBLEM IS THE HUNGER >> THE PROBLEM IS THE HUNGER GAMES ABOUT IT

GAMES ABOUT IT BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT’S HAPPENING BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT’S HAPPENING HERE HERE AND IT’S A PROBLEM BECAUSE IT AND IT’S A PROBLEM BECAUSE IT CREATES MORE CONCENTRATION IN CREATES MORE CONCENTRATION IN THE INDUSTRY THE INDUSTRY

YOU KNOW, THEY’RE NOT OFFERING YOU KNOW, THEY’RE NOT OFFERING THE CITIES AND TOWNS A ZILLION THE CITIES AND TOWNS A ZILLION BUCKS IN GOODIES AND TAX BREAKS BUCKS IN GOODIES AND TAX BREAKS TO THE ENTREPRENEUR WHO’S TO THE ENTREPRENEUR WHO’S GETTING STARTED TO THE SMALL GETTING STARTED TO THE SMALL BUSINESS THAT’S TRYING TO MAKE A BUSINESS THAT’S TRYING TO MAKE A GO OF IT GO OF IT EVEN TO THE MEDIUM SIZED EVEN TO THE MEDIUM SIZED BUSINESS AND BIG BUSINESS THAT BUSINESS AND BIG BUSINESS THAT WANT TO GROW MORE WANT TO GROW MORE NOPE

NOPE THIS IS ABOUT THE GIANTS WHO ARE THIS IS ABOUT THE GIANTS WHO ARE ABLE TO SWAGGER INTO TOWN AND ABLE TO SWAGGER INTO TOWN AND SAY, LAY IN FRONT OF ME WHAT SAY, LAY IN FRONT OF ME WHAT YOU’RE GOING OFFER YOU’RE GOING OFFER AND I’LL DECIDE IF I LIKE IT OR AND I’LL DECIDE IF I LIKE IT OR NOT AND THEN I’LL GO SOMEWHERE NOT AND THEN I’LL GO SOMEWHERE ELSE AND SEE WHAT THEY’LL OFFER ELSE AND SEE WHAT THEY’LL OFFER

BY THE WAY, IF YOU START ASKING BY THE WAY, IF YOU START ASKING ME HARD QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ME HARD QUESTIONS ABOUT THE JOBS, ABOUT WHERE THE MONEY’S JOBS, ABOUT WHERE THE MONEY’S GOING TO COME FROM, ABOUT HOW GOING TO COME FROM, ABOUT HOW MUCH GUARANTEE I’M PUTTING INTO MUCH GUARANTEE I’M PUTTING INTO THIS, I’LL JUST GET MAD AND GO THIS, I’LL JUST GET MAD AND GO SOMEWHERE ELSE SOMEWHERE ELSE >> YOUR NEW PLAN ALSO TALKS A >> YOUR NEW PLAN ALSO TALKS A LOT ABOUT ANTITRUST LOT ABOUT ANTITRUST YOU’VE BEEN CRITICAL OF THE AT&T YOU’VE BEEN CRITICAL OF THE AT&T MERGER WITH CNN’S PARENT MERGER WITH CNN’S PARENT COMPANY

COMPANY SO HAS DONALD TRUMP BUT HIS SO HAS DONALD TRUMP BUT HIS REASON WAS HE WANTED TO USE REASON WAS HE WANTED TO USE THOSE POWERS TO BEAT UP ON CNN THOSE POWERS TO BEAT UP ON CNN >> THAT’S RIGHT >> THAT’S RIGHT

>> IS THAT WRONG AND IF SO WHAT >> IS THAT WRONG AND IF SO WHAT DO YOU DO ABOUT IT? DO YOU DO ABOUT IT? >> IT’S VERY WRONG >> IT’S VERY WRONG FOR THE PRESIDENT TO SAY I WANT FOR THE PRESIDENT TO SAY I WANT TO SEE AN ANTITRUST PROSECUTION TO SEE AN ANTITRUST PROSECUTION BASED ON POLITICAL ADVANTAGE TO BASED ON POLITICAL ADVANTAGE TO THE PRESIDENT, IT’S ABOUT AS THE PRESIDENT, IT’S ABOUT AS WRONG AS IT GETS WRONG AS IT GETS WHAT I WANT TO SEE IS ANTITRUST WHAT I WANT TO SEE IS ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT BECAUSE IT PROTECTS ENFORCEMENT BECAUSE IT PROTECTS MARKETS

MARKETS BECAUSE IT PROTECTS SMALL BECAUSE IT PROTECTS SMALL COMPETITORS COMPETITORS BECAUSE IT PROTECTS CONSUMERS BECAUSE IT PROTECTS CONSUMERS OVER THE LONG RUN OVER THE LONG RUN

>> SO HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH WHAT >> SO HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH WHAT HE HAS ALLEGEDLY DONE? HE HAS ALLEGEDLY DONE? AND SHOULD THERE BE PUNISHMENT AND SHOULD THERE BE PUNISHMENT FOR THAT? FOR THAT? >> WELL, I THINK — I THINK >> WELL, I THINK — I THINK THERE’S GOING TO BE A VERY THERE’S GOING TO BE A VERY SERIOUS INVESTIGATION ABOUT SERIOUS INVESTIGATION ABOUT THIS THIS THERE’S A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION THERE’S A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER WHAT HE’S DONE WAS ABOUT WHETHER WHAT HE’S DONE WAS LEGAL LEGAL >> THAT MAY HAVE BEEN A LEGAL >> THAT MAY HAVE BEEN A LEGAL WAY TO ATTACK CNN

WAY TO ATTACK CNN >> MAY HAVE BEEN >> MAY HAVE BEEN >> LET’S GO TO THE WAY THE >> LET’S GO TO THE WAY THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT IS RUN TREASURY DEPARTMENT IS RUN

I’LL DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO A I’LL DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO A SIMPLE ILLUSTRATION ON THE SIMPLE ILLUSTRATION ON THE SCREEN SCREEN YOU HAVE IN THE RED ZONE THERE YOU HAVE IN THE RED ZONE THERE GOLDMAN SACHS AS PART OF GOLDMAN SACHS AS PART OF TREASURY DEPARTMENT LEADERSHIP TREASURY DEPARTMENT LEADERSHIP IF YOU GO BACK TO THE OBAMA ERA, IF YOU GO BACK TO THE OBAMA ERA, WE HAD GOLDMAN SACHS FORMER WE HAD GOLDMAN SACHS FORMER EXECUTIVES RUNNING TREASURY EXECUTIVES RUNNING TREASURY THEN

THEN BUSH, ALSO GOLDMAN SACHS, ALSO BUSH, ALSO GOLDMAN SACHS, ALSO GOLDMAN SACHS GOLDMAN SACHS IN A WARREN ADMINISTRATION, IN A WARREN ADMINISTRATION, WOULD THERE BE A FORMER GOLDMAN WOULD THERE BE A FORMER GOLDMAN SACHS EXECUTIVE RUNNING THE SACHS EXECUTIVE RUNNING THE TREASURY? TREASURY? >> NOPE >> NOPE

LET ME TELL YOU WHY LET ME TELL YOU WHY THE PROBLEM WE’VE GOT RIGHT NOW THE PROBLEM WE’VE GOT RIGHT NOW IS A REVOLVING DOOR BETWEEN IS A REVOLVING DOOR BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND WALL STREET THAT WASHINGTON AND WALL STREET THAT CAUSES EVERYBODY TO BE ON GUESS CAUSES EVERYBODY TO BE ON GUESS FOR WAIT A MINUTE, THE NEXT TIME FOR WAIT A MINUTE, THE NEXT TIME THIS TREASURY SECRETARY PUTS THIS TREASURY SECRETARY PUTS FORWARD A PROPOSAL, IS IT FORWARD A PROPOSAL, IS IT BECAUSE IT REALLY HELPS THE BECAUSE IT REALLY HELPS THE ECONOMY? ECONOMY? HELPS THE AMERICAN CONSUMER? HELPS THE AMERICAN CONSUMER? HELPS THE AMERICAN HOMEOWNER? HELPS THE AMERICAN HOMEOWNER? OR IS IT BECAUSE IT HELPS THEIR OR IS IT BECAUSE IT HELPS THEIR FORMER AND POSSIBLY FUTURE FORMER AND POSSIBLY FUTURE EMPLOYER? EMPLOYER? LET’S JUST DO FOR ONE SECOND LET’S JUST DO FOR ONE SECOND THIS GARY COHN EXAMPLE THIS GARY COHN EXAMPLE ANOTHER GOLDMAN SACHS

ANOTHER GOLDMAN SACHS YOU REMEMBER YOU REMEMBER TRUMP APPOINTS GARY COHN TRUMP APPOINTS GARY COHN

HE LEAVES GOLDMAN SACHS HE LEAVES GOLDMAN SACHS AND GARY COHN IS GOING TO HAVE AND GARY COHN IS GOING TO HAVE EXACTLY ONE JOB EXACTLY ONE JOB AND THAT IS TO RAMROD THROUGH A AND THAT IS TO RAMROD THROUGH A REWRITE OF THE TAX LAWS THAT REWRITE OF THE TAX LAWS THAT WILL PROFOUNDLY AFFECT GOLDMAN WILL PROFOUNDLY AFFECT GOLDMAN SACHS

SACHS WHAT DOES GOLDMAN SACHS DO AS WHAT DOES GOLDMAN SACHS DO AS GARY WALKS OUT THE DOOR? GARY WALKS OUT THE DOOR? THEY HAND HIM NEARLY A QUARTER THEY HAND HIM NEARLY A QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLARS OF A BILLION DOLLARS IT’S A GIFT IT’S A GIFT

THEY DON’T HAVE TO THEY DON’T HAVE TO >> IS IT LEGAL BRIBERY? >> IS IT LEGAL BRIBERY? >> I THINK OF IT AS A PRE-BRIBE >> I THINK OF IT AS A PRE-BRIBE >> PRE-BRIBE? >> PRE-BRIBE? >> YES

>> YES SO THEN GARY GOES OUT AND GUESS SO THEN GARY GOES OUT AND GUESS WHAT HE DOES WHAT HE DOES HE WRITES A TAX LAW AND MANAGES HE WRITES A TAX LAW AND MANAGES TO HELP RAMROD IT THROUGH THAT TO HELP RAMROD IT THROUGH THAT BENEFITS GOLDMAN SACHS TO THE BENEFITS GOLDMAN SACHS TO THE TUNE OF, OH, A QUARTER OF A TUNE OF, OH, A QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLARS IN THE FIRST GO BILLION DOLLARS IN THE FIRST GO AROUND AROUND

AND THEN IT’S THE GIFT THAT AND THEN IT’S THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING KEEPS ON GIVING >> WHAT YOU’RE SAYING MAKES >> WHAT YOU’RE SAYING MAKES SENSE AND WE HAVE SUCH RIPE SENSE AND WE HAVE SUCH RIPE TARGETS I THINK PEOPLE COULD TARGETS I THINK PEOPLE COULD UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU’RE POINTING UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU’RE POINTING TO TO BUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE BUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IF THIS WAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY IF THIS WAS ALSO HOW OBAMA AND CLINTON RAN ALSO HOW OBAMA AND CLINTON RAN THE TREASURY? THE TREASURY? WOULD YOU BE A FUNDAMENTAL BREAK WOULD YOU BE A FUNDAMENTAL BREAK WITH THAT IS THE QUESTION

WITH THAT IS THE QUESTION >> THE PROBLEM — I HAVE WRITTEN >> THE PROBLEM — I HAVE WRITTEN THE BIGGEST ANTICORRUPTION BILL THE BIGGEST ANTICORRUPTION BILL SINCE WATERGATE SINCE WATERGATE BECAUSE WE HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL BECAUSE WE HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM IN WASHINGTON PROBLEM IN WASHINGTON

AND UNDERSTAND IT’S A PROBLEM AND UNDERSTAND IT’S A PROBLEM THAT PREDATES TRUMP BY DECADES THAT PREDATES TRUMP BY DECADES >> RIGHT >> RIGHT >> TRUMP MAY BE THE MOST EXTREME >> TRUMP MAY BE THE MOST EXTREME EXAMPLE NOW

EXAMPLE NOW THE PRE-BRIBES OF GARY COHN, FOR THE PRE-BRIBES OF GARY COHN, FOR EXAMPLE EXAMPLE BUT WE HAVE A LONG STANDING BUT WE HAVE A LONG STANDING PROBLEM PROBLEM

AND THAT’S THE INFLUENCE OF AND THAT’S THE INFLUENCE OF MONEY ON DECISION MAKING IN MONEY ON DECISION MAKING IN WASHINGTON WASHINGTON SO THIS BILL HAS LOTS OF PIECES SO THIS BILL HAS LOTS OF PIECES TO IT INCLUDING CLOSING THE TO IT INCLUDING CLOSING THE REVOLVEING DOOR BETWEEN WALL REVOLVEING DOOR BETWEEN WALL STREET AND WASHINGTON STREET AND WASHINGTON ENDING LOBBYING AS WE KNOW IT

ENDING LOBBYING AS WE KNOW IT PUTTING A REAL ETHICS COP ON THE PUTTING A REAL ETHICS COP ON THE BEAT SAYING THAT THE HEADS OF BEAT SAYING THAT THE HEADS OF THESE AGENCIES CANNOT BE TRADING THESE AGENCIES CANNOT BE TRADING IN STOCK IN STOCK >> SO AS A POLITICAL MATTER, ARE >> SO AS A POLITICAL MATTER, ARE YOU BASICALLY WRITING OFF A YOU BASICALLY WRITING OFF A BUNCH OF WALL STREET MONEY AND BUNCH OF WALL STREET MONEY AND TODAY YOU’RE WRITING OFF A BUNCH TODAY YOU’RE WRITING OFF A BUNCH OF SILICON VALLEY MONEY? OF SILICON VALLEY MONEY? >> MAYBE >> MAYBE

BUT THIS ISN’T ABOUT THE MONEY BUT THIS ISN’T ABOUT THE MONEY THIS IS ABOUT HOW IT IS WE’RE THIS IS ABOUT HOW IT IS WE’RE GOING TO MAKE THIS COUNTRY WORK GOING TO MAKE THIS COUNTRY WORK AGAIN NOT JUST FOR THE RICH AND AGAIN NOT JUST FOR THE RICH AND THE POWERFUL THE POWERFUL HOW WE’RE GOING TO MAKE IT WORK HOW WE’RE GOING TO MAKE IT WORK FOR EVERYONE

FOR EVERYONE YOU KNOW, WE LIVE IN AN AMERICA YOU KNOW, WE LIVE IN AN AMERICA RIGHT NOW WHERE WASHINGTON WORKS RIGHT NOW WHERE WASHINGTON WORKS GREAT FOR GIANT DRUG COMPANIES, GREAT FOR GIANT DRUG COMPANIES, JUST NOT FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO JUST NOT FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO FILL A PRESCRIPTION FILL A PRESCRIPTION >> YOU TALK ABOUT HOW THE >> YOU TALK ABOUT HOW THE BELTWAY WORKS BELTWAY WORKS

EVERYONE HAS BEEN TALKING ABOUT EVERYONE HAS BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE RATHER LIGHT SENTENCE THAT THE RATHER LIGHT SENTENCE THAT PAUL MANAFORT GOT PAUL MANAFORT GOT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THAT, DOES THAT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THAT, DOES THAT REFLECT WHAT YOU’RE SAYING? REFLECT WHAT YOU’RE SAYING? >> YEAH >> YEAH >> WASHINGTON WORKS WELL FOR THE >> WASHINGTON WORKS WELL FOR THE CONNECTED AND AFFLUENT AND CONNECTED AND AFFLUENT AND NOBODY ELSE? NOBODY ELSE? >> YEAH

>> YEAH IT’S TWO DIFFERENT JUSTICE IT’S TWO DIFFERENT JUSTICE SYSTEMS SYSTEMS EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW

BUT LOOK AT THE REALITY BUT LOOK AT THE REALITY PEOPLE WHO GOT BUCKETS OF MONEY PEOPLE WHO GOT BUCKETS OF MONEY AND ARE WELL CONNECTED GET AND ARE WELL CONNECTED GET TREATED WITH KID GLOVES TREATED WITH KID GLOVES AND EVERYBODY ELSE DOESN’T

AND EVERYBODY ELSE DOESN’T >> DO YOU THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT >> DO YOU THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT THAT STATISTICALLY THAT A THAT STATISTICALLY THAT A SIMILAR DEFENDANT WHO MIGHT HAVE SIMILAR DEFENDANT WHO MIGHT HAVE BEEN POOR AND BLACK WOULD HAVE BEEN POOR AND BLACK WOULD HAVE GOTTEN A DIFFERENT SENTENCE GOTTEN A DIFFERENT SENTENCE >> OH, WE KNOW THE DATA ON THIS >> OH, WE KNOW THE DATA ON THIS

OF COURSE THE SENTENCE WOULD OF COURSE THE SENTENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT IN FACT, STUDY AFTER STUDY AFTER IN FACT, STUDY AFTER STUDY AFTER STUDY SHOWS THAT FOR THE EXACT STUDY SHOWS THAT FOR THE EXACT SAME CRIMES, AFRICAN-AMERICANS SAME CRIMES, AFRICAN-AMERICANS ARE MORE LIKELY THAN WHITES TO ARE MORE LIKELY THAN WHITES TO BE ARRESTED, TO BE PROSECUTED, BE ARRESTED, TO BE PROSECUTED, TO BE WRONGFULLY CONVICTED, AND TO BE WRONGFULLY CONVICTED, AND TO RECEIVE HARSHER SENTENCES TO RECEIVE HARSHER SENTENCES RACE MATTERS IN OUR CRIMINAL RACE MATTERS IN OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

JUSTICE SYSTEM AND IT IS NOT A SYSTEM OF EQUAL AND IT IS NOT A SYSTEM OF EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW JUSTICE UNDER LAW >> ON THE MUELLER PROBE, I READ >> ON THE MUELLER PROBE, I READ A PLEDGE YOU RECENTLY MADE A PLEDGE YOU RECENTLY MADE

YOU SAID — THIS IS INTERESTING YOU SAID — THIS IS INTERESTING YOU WOULD ISSUE, QUOTE, NO YOU WOULD ISSUE, QUOTE, NO PARDONS FOR ANYONE IMPLICATED IN PARDONS FOR ANYONE IMPLICATED IN THE INVESTIGATIONS INTO DONALD THE INVESTIGATIONS INTO DONALD TRUMP TRUMP >> UH-HUH

>> UH-HUH >> HOW CAN YOU KNOW THAT BEFORE >> HOW CAN YOU KNOW THAT BEFORE THE INVESTIGATIONS ARE OVER? THE INVESTIGATIONS ARE OVER? WOULD THAT INCLUDE SOMEONE LIKE WOULD THAT INCLUDE SOMEONE LIKE ANDY McCABE, THE FORMER ACTING ANDY McCABE, THE FORMER ACTING FBI DIRECTOR WHO’S UNDER FBI DIRECTOR WHO’S UNDER INVESTIGATION RIGHT NOW IN THE INVESTIGATION RIGHT NOW IN THE DC OFFICE? DC

OFFICE? >> BECAUSE I KNOW WHAT PARDONS >> BECAUSE I KNOW WHAT PARDONS ARE FOR ARE FOR PARDONS ARE THERE FOR THE PARDONS ARE THERE FOR THE POWERLESS TO SHOW A LITTLE POWERLESS TO SHOW A LITTLE JUSTICE JUSTICE THAT THEY NEED

THAT THEY NEED PARDONS ARE NOT THERE AS PART OF PARDONS ARE NOT THERE AS PART OF A PLEA AGREEMENT A PLEA AGREEMENT THAT’S SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE THAT’S SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE SYSTEM SYSTEM

WE RESERVE PARDONS FOR THOSE WE RESERVE PARDONS FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T RECEIVE PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T RECEIVE JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW AND I’M NOT THERE TO SAY PARDONS AND I’M NOT THERE TO SAY PARDONS ARE GOING TO BE PART OF A ARE GOING TO BE PART OF A POLITICAL HORSE TRADE OF MY POLITICAL HORSE TRADE OF MY ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION HUH-UH

HUH-UH >> DOES THAT MEAN YOU WOULD >> DOES THAT MEAN YOU WOULD COMMIT TO SAYING YOU’RE NEVER COMMIT TO SAYING YOU’RE NEVER GOING TO PARDON ANYONE THAT GOING TO PARDON ANYONE THAT WORKED DIRECTLY FOR YOU? WORKED DIRECTLY FOR YOU? >> I ASSUME SO >> I ASSUME SO I DON’T KNOW IF ANY CASE WHY I I DON’T KNOW IF ANY CASE WHY I WOULD DO THAT WOULD DO THAT

THIS IS ABOUT THE POWERLESS THIS IS ABOUT THE POWERLESS THAT’S WHAT PARDONS ARE SUPPOSED THAT’S WHAT PARDONS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT TO BE ABOUT NOT ABOUT PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT ABOUT PEOPLE WHO HAVE CONNECTIONS

CONNECTIONS NOT ABOUT PEOPLE WHO — NOT NOT ABOUT PEOPLE WHO — NOT ABOUT PEOPLE WHO HAVE A WAY TO ABOUT PEOPLE WHO HAVE A WAY TO BE PROTECTED, WHO CAN HIRE THE BE PROTECTED, WHO CAN HIRE THE LAWYERS, WHO GET TO WORK THEIR LAWYERS, WHO GET TO WORK THEIR WAY THROUGH THE SYSTEM, WHO GET WAY THROUGH THE SYSTEM, WHO GET THE BEST REPRESENTATION THE BEST REPRESENTATION PARDONS ARE ABOUT ONE LAST WAY PARDONS ARE ABOUT ONE LAST WAY THAT WE TRY TO PUT A LITTLE THAT WE TRY TO PUT A LITTLE JUSTICE BACK INTO A SYSTEM THAT JUSTICE BACK INTO A SYSTEM THAT TODAY IS VERY UNJUST TODAY IS VERY UNJUST

>> IF BOB MUELLER FINISHES THIS >> IF BOB MUELLER FINISHES THIS PROBE WITH NO FURTHER PROBE WITH NO FURTHER INDICTMENTS, SO THEY DON’T INDICTMENTS, SO THEY DON’T INDICT ANYONE IN AMERICA FOR INDICT ANYONE IN AMERICA FOR HELPING THE RUSSIANS COLLUDE, HELPING THE RUSSIANS COLLUDE, WHAT DO YOU THINK THEN IS THE WHAT DO YOU THINK THEN IS THE CONCLUSION AND DO PEOPLE WHO CONCLUSION AND DO PEOPLE WHO WERE HOPING THIS WOULD ALL BUST WERE HOPING THIS WOULD ALL BUST DONALD TRUMP HAVE TO ACCEPT DONALD TRUMP HAVE TO ACCEPT THOSE LAWFUL FINDINGS EVEN IF THOSE LAWFUL FINDINGS EVEN IF THEY DON’T GO AS FAR AS SOME THEY DON’T GO AS FAR AS SOME WANT? WANT? >> SO LOOK >> SO LOOK I DON’T KNOW WHAT HIS REPORT IS I DON’T KNOW WHAT HIS REPORT IS GOING TO SAY GOING TO SAY WE’LL HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE

WE’LL HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE HIS REPORT HAS ALREADY PRODUCED HIS REPORT HAS ALREADY PRODUCED NEARLY THREE DOZEN INDICTMENTS NEARLY THREE DOZEN INDICTMENTS OR GUILTY PLEAS OR GUILTY PLEAS THIS IS A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION THIS IS A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION

IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE’VE GOT IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE’VE GOT INVESTIGATIONS THAT ARE GOING ON INVESTIGATIONS THAT ARE GOING ON IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS AND THE HOUSE HAS JUST STARTED AND THE HOUSE HAS JUST STARTED ITS OWN SERIES OF ITS OWN SERIES OF INVESTIGATIONS INVESTIGATIONS YOU KNOW, THE SOUND OF HOOF YOU KNOW, THE SOUND OF HOOF BEATS OF ALL THOSE BEATS OF ALL THOSE INVESTIGATIONS CATCHING UP WITH INVESTIGATIONS CATCHING UP WITH DONALD TRUMP MUST BE LOUD IN HIS DONALD TRUMP MUST BE LOUD IN HIS EARS

EARS >> I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT SOME >> I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT SOME POLITICS AND SOME OF THE FUN POLITICS AND SOME OF THE FUN STUFF, WHAT MAKES YOU TICK STUFF, WHAT MAKES YOU TICK >> OKAY >> OKAY

O O >> ON THE POLITICS, THE >> ON THE POLITICS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY SAID YOU WON’T DEMOCRATIC PARTY SAID YOU WON’T DO DEBATES WITH FOX NEWS DO DEBATES WITH FOX NEWS IS THAT THE RIGHT CALL? IS THAT THE RIGHT CALL? >> THIS IS ULTIMATELY A DECISION >> THIS IS ULTIMATELY A DECISION FOR THE PARTY TO MAKE FOR THE PARTY TO MAKE BUT I DO UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN BUT I DO UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN MORE AND MORE KEEPS COMING OUT MORE AND MORE KEEPS COMING OUT ABOUT HOW FOX NEWS WAS JUST ABOUT HOW FOX NEWS WAS JUST OPERATING AS AN ARM OF THE TRUMP OPERATING AS AN ARM OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND THEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND THEN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, BOY, THAT ADMINISTRATION, BOY, THAT DOESN’T MUCH LOOK LIKE WE REALLY DOESN’T MUCH LOOK LIKE WE REALLY HAVE A FREE AND INDEPENDENT HAVE A FREE AND INDEPENDENT PRESS

PRESS IT JUST LOOKS LIKE A PROPAGANDA IT JUST LOOKS LIKE A PROPAGANDA MACHINE MACHINE >> SO YOU AGREE WITH THE >> SO YOU AGREE WITH THE CHAIRMAN? CHAIRMAN? >> I UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS THAT >> I UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WOULD SAY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WOULD SAY WE’RE JUST NOT GOING TO BE A WE’RE JUST NOT GOING TO BE A PART OF THAT PART OF THAT

AND I — YOU KNOW, LOOK AND I — YOU KNOW, LOOK I WANT TO BE ABLE TO GET OUT AND I WANT TO BE ABLE TO GET OUT AND TALK TO EVERYONE TALK TO EVERYONE I MEAN, I’LL JUST TELL YOU THAT I MEAN, I’LL JUST TELL YOU THAT AS A CANDIDATE

AS A CANDIDATE I WANT TO BE IN EVERYBODY’S I WANT TO BE IN EVERYBODY’S LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM I WANT A CHANCE TO REACH OUT TO I WANT A CHANCE TO REACH OUT TO EVERYONE EVERYONE

>> AND THAT MAKES SENSE >> AND THAT MAKES SENSE I GUESS THE THING WE HEARD FROM I GUESS THE THING WE HEARD FROM A LOT OF ACTIVISTS IS WHILE YOU A LOT OF ACTIVISTS IS WHILE YOU MIGHT TALK TO WHOEVER YOU CHOOSE MIGHT TALK TO WHOEVER YOU CHOOSE TO, WHY SHOULD AN ENTITY TO, WHY SHOULD AN ENTITY PERCEIVED AS AN ARM OF THE TRUMP PERCEIVED AS AN ARM OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PICK WHO RUNS ADMINISTRATION PICK WHO RUNS AGAINST TRUMP? AGAINST TRUMP? MIKE BLOOMBERG MIKE BLOOMBERG DO YOU WANT HIS ENDORSEMENT? DO YOU WANT HIS ENDORSEMENT? >> LOOK, I’M GLAD TO HAVE >> LOOK, I’M GLAD TO HAVE EVERYBODY’S ENDORSEMENT BUT I’M EVERYBODY’S ENDORSEMENT BUT I’M NOT OUT LOOKING FOR ANY OF THEM

NOT OUT LOOKING FOR ANY OF THEM >> YOU’RE NOT ASKING? >> YOU’RE NOT ASKING? >> NOPE >> NOPE NOT ASKING NOT ASKING

>> OKAY >> OKAY BERNIE SANDERS HAS MORE BERNIE SANDERS HAS MORE INDIVIDUAL DONORS RIGHT NOW THAN INDIVIDUAL DONORS RIGHT NOW THAN ANY OTHER DEM CANDIDATE BY A ANY OTHER DEM CANDIDATE BY A LONG WAYS LONG WAYS >> UH-HUH

>> UH-HUH >> IS THAT BECAUSE HE’S REALLY >> IS THAT BECAUSE HE’S REALLY POPULAR WITH THE GRASSROOTS OR POPULAR WITH THE GRASSROOTS OR HE’S GOOD AT RAISING MONEY? HE’S GOOD AT RAISING MONEY? >> I ASSUME IT’S BECAUSE HE’S >> I ASSUME IT’S BECAUSE HE’S POPULAR WITH THE GRASSROOTS POPULAR WITH THE GRASSROOTS BERNIE HAS BEEN OUT THERE BERNIE HAS BEEN OUT THERE FIGHTING HIS FIGHT FIGHTING HIS FIGHT

>> IS HE THE FRONT RUNNER? >> IS HE THE FRONT RUNNER? >> I — YOU NEED A PUNDIT FOR >> I — YOU NEED A PUNDIT FOR THIS THIS BUT IT SURE LOOKS LIKE IT BUT IT SURE LOOKS LIKE IT >> IT DOES LOOK LIKE IT

>> IT DOES LOOK LIKE IT >> IT’S NOT MY BUSINESS >> IT’S NOT MY BUSINESS >> NOT YOUR THING >> NOT YOUR THING

YOU SPENT MOST OF YOUR LIFE IN YOU SPENT MOST OF YOUR LIFE IN OTHER TYPES OF SERVICE OTHER TYPES OF SERVICE HOW OLD WERE YOU WHEN YOU FIRST HOW OLD WERE YOU WHEN YOU FIRST THOUGHT I THINK I MIGHT RUN FOR THOUGHT I THINK I MIGHT RUN FOR OFFICE? OFFICE? >> GOLLY >> GOLLY LET’S SEE

LET’S SEE I COULD DO THE MATH, BUT I WAS I COULD DO THE MATH, BUT I WAS IN MY 60s IN MY 60s I NEVER WAS GOING TO DO THIS I NEVER WAS GOING TO DO THIS

>> WHEN YOU WERE TEACHING, THIS >> WHEN YOU WERE TEACHING, THIS WAS NOT THE NEXT STEP? WAS NOT THE NEXT STEP? >> NOT EVEN CLOSE >> NOT EVEN CLOSE >> THE NEXT ONES ARE FUN OR >> THE NEXT ONES ARE FUN OR MAYBE NERDY FUN MAYBE NERDY FUN WE CAN DO THEM AS FAST AS WE CAN DO THEM AS FAST AS POSSIBLE

POSSIBLE WE CALL IT THE LIGHTNING ROUND WE CALL IT THE LIGHTNING ROUND SOMETIMES SOMETIMES PAST OR PRESENT, FAVORITE MEMBER PAST OR PRESENT, FAVORITE MEMBER OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS? GOVERNORS? >> JANET YELLEN >> JANET YELLEN

SHE IS FABULOUS SHE IS FABULOUS >> INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY >> INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY WOMAN PAST OR PRESENT WHO WOMAN PAST OR PRESENT WHO INSPIRES YOU? INSPIRES YOU? >> OH

>> OH LET ME THINK LET ME THINK BELLA ABSEG BELLA ABSEG

YOU KNOW, A WOMAN WHO JUST GOT YOU KNOW, A WOMAN WHO JUST GOT OUT THERE AND FOUGHT FOR WHAT OUT THERE AND FOUGHT FOR WHAT SHE BELIEVED IN SHE BELIEVED IN I LOVE IT I LOVE IT >> I’VE GOT A COUPLE ONE-WORD >> I’VE GOT A COUPLE ONE-WORD ASSOCIATIONS

ASSOCIATIONS IF YOU COULD DO IT IN A WORD IF YOU COULD DO IT IN A WORD SOME OF THEM RELATE TO YOUR SOME OF THEM RELATE TO YOUR BILL BILL

AMAZON AMAZON >> CAN I HAVE TWO WORDS? >> CAN I HAVE TWO WORDS? >> SURE >> SURE >> TOO BIG

>> TOO BIG >> GOOGLE >> GOOGLE >> TOO BIG >> TOO BIG

>> FACEBOOK >> FACEBOOK >> TOO BIG >> TOO BIG >> MARK ZUCKERBERG

>> MARK ZUCKERBERG >> TOO POWERFUL >> TOO POWERFUL AND THAT’S REALLY THE POINT OF AND THAT’S REALLY THE POINT OF THE TOO BIGS THE TOO BIGS

IT’S THEY’VE GOT TOO MUCH POWER IT’S THEY’VE GOT TOO MUCH POWER AND THEY GET TO USE THAT POWER AND THEY GET TO USE THAT POWER NOW TO DOMINATE MARKETS, TO CHEW NOW TO DOMINATE MARKETS, TO CHEW UP COMPETITORS, AND ULTIMATELY UP COMPETITORS, AND ULTIMATELY TO CHANGE THE CONSUMER TO CHANGE THE CONSUMER EXPERIENCE EXPERIENCE WE GOT TO CHANGE THAT

WE GOT TO CHANGE THAT >> FAVORITE SONG TO WORK OUT TO? >> FAVORITE SONG TO WORK OUT TO? >> ANYTHING FROM PATSY CLINE >> ANYTHING FROM PATSY CLINE >> FAVORITE ALBUM OR ARTIST WHEN >> FAVORITE ALBUM OR ARTIST WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP? YOU WERE GROWING UP? >> ANY OF THE BEATLES >> ANY OF THE BEATLES

PROBABLY THE WHITE ALBUM PROBABLY THE WHITE ALBUM >> NOW I GOT TO KNOW YOUR >> NOW I GOT TO KNOW YOUR FAVORITE BEATLE? FAVORITE BEATLE? >> OH, NO >> OH, NO THAT’S LIKE ASKING YOUR FAVORITE THAT’S LIKE ASKING YOUR FAVORITE CHILD

CHILD >> I WOULD GUESS, BUT WHAT DO I >> I WOULD GUESS, BUT WHAT DO I KNOW KNOW I WOULD GUESS LENNON I WOULD GUESS LENNON

GEORGE HARRIS? GEORGE HARRIS? BOOM BOOM YOUR DREAM RUNNING MATE YOUR DREAM RUNNING MATE THROUGHOUT HISTORY LIVING OR THROUGHOUT HISTORY LIVING OR DEAD IF YOU COULD PICK A PERSON DEAD IF YOU COULD PICK A PERSON THAT WOULD RUN WITH YOU? THAT WOULD RUN WITH YOU? >> TEDDY ROOSEVELT >> TEDDY ROOSEVELT >> A REPUBLICAN

>> A REPUBLICAN >> YEP >> YEP >> BECAUSE HE TOOK ON THE >> BECAUSE HE TOOK ON THE TRUSTS? TRUSTS? >> BECAUSE HE WAS BRAVE >> BECAUSE HE WAS BRAVE

AND HE TOOK ON THE TRUSTS AND HE TOOK ON THE TRUSTS AND HE DIDN’T CARE HOW MANY AND HE DIDN’T CARE HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE GOING TO BE MAD PEOPLE WERE GOING TO BE MAD ABOUT IT ABOUT IT AND HE DID IT — THIS IS WHAT’S AND HE DID IT — THIS IS WHAT’S AMAZING — FOR THE RIGHT AMAZING — FOR THE RIGHT REASONS

REASONS IT WASN’T JUST THAT THEY WERE IT WASN’T JUST THAT THEY WERE BIG BIG IT WASN’T JUST THAT THEY WERE IT WASN’T JUST THAT THEY WERE DOMINATING AN ECONOMY DOMINATING AN ECONOMY

IT WASN’T JUST THAT THEY WERE IT WASN’T JUST THAT THEY WERE PUTTING FARMERS OUT OF BUSINESS PUTTING FARMERS OUT OF BUSINESS AND COMPETITORS OUT OF BUSINESS AND COMPETITORS OUT OF BUSINESS AND SMALL COMPANIES OUT OF AND SMALL COMPANIES OUT OF BUSINESS BUSINESS IT WAS THAT THEY HAD TOO MUCH IT WAS THAT THEY HAD TOO MUCH POLITICAL POWER POLITICAL POWER AND IT WAS THE VERY FACT OF THAT AND IT WAS THE VERY FACT OF THAT POLITICAL POWER THAT CAUSED POLITICAL POWER THAT CAUSED TEDDY ROOSEVELT TO SAY I’M GOING TEDDY ROOSEVELT TO SAY I’M GOING TO BE A TRUST BUSTER

TO BE A TRUST BUSTER MAN, I’D LIKE TO HAVE THAT GUY MAN, I’D LIKE TO HAVE THAT GUY AT MY SIDE AT MY SIDE >> THERE IS A BELOVED ACTRESS >> THERE IS A BELOVED ACTRESS WHO’S BEEN TALKING ABOUT YOU WHO’S BEEN TALKING ABOUT YOU

ANNETTE BENNING ANNETTE BENNING >> YES >> YES >> LET’S TAKE A LOOK

>> LET’S TAKE A LOOK I THINK WE HAVE THIS FOR YOU I THINK WE HAVE THIS FOR YOU ANNETTE BENNING SAYS SHE KNOWS ANNETTE BENNING SAYS SHE KNOWS SHE LOOKS LIKE ELIZABETH WARREN, SHE LOOKS LIKE ELIZABETH WARREN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH THANK YOU VERY MUCH

>> WHOA! >> WHOA! I’M FLATTERED I’M FLATTERED >> DOES SHE LOOK LIKE YOU OR YOU >> DOES SHE LOOK LIKE YOU OR YOU LOOK LIKE HER? LOOK LIKE HER? >> EITHER WAY >> EITHER WAY I’M TOTALLY HAPPY WITH THIS I’M TOTALLY HAPPY WITH THIS COMPARISON

COMPARISON >> YOU LIKE THIS >> YOU LIKE THIS WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE IF AND WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE IF AND WHEN THERE’S A WARREN WHEN THERE’S A WARREN ADMINISTRATION AND THERE’S A ADMINISTRATION AND THERE’S A WARREN MOVIE, WOULD YOU BE WARREN MOVIE, WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE WITH HER PLAYING COMFORTABLE WITH HER PLAYING YOU? YOU? >> I’M ALL IN >> I’M ALL IN

>> HAVE YOU GUYS EVER MET? >> HAVE YOU GUYS EVER MET? >> YES, ACTUALLY >> YES, ACTUALLY ONCE ONCE >> AND? >> AND? >> I THINK SHE ACTUALLY DOES — >> I THINK SHE ACTUALLY DOES — I THINK WE KIND OF LOOK LIKE I THINK WE KIND OF LOOK LIKE EACH OTHER

EACH OTHER >> DID YOU TALK ABOUT IT AT THE >> DID YOU TALK ABOUT IT AT THE TIME? TIME? >> A LITTLE BIT >> A LITTLE BIT >> WE HAVE TO ASK HOW BAILEY’S >> WE HAVE TO ASK HOW BAILEY’S DOING DOING

THIS DOG IS BELOVED ON YOUR THIS DOG IS BELOVED ON YOUR CAMPAIGN CAMPAIGN >> THIS DOG IS THE BEST >> THIS DOG IS THE BEST BETWEEN THE BAILEY CAM AND THE BETWEEN THE BAILEY CAM AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET PEOPLE AND OPPORTUNITY TO MEET PEOPLE AND VOTERS

VOTERS AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN BRINGING AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN BRINGING HIM LITTLE TREATS HIM LITTLE TREATS SO BAILEY’S FILLING OUT NOW FOR SO BAILEY’S FILLING OUT NOW FOR A 10-MONTH-OLD DOG A 10-MONTH-OLD DOG

>> AND HE HAS HIS OWN GREETING >> AND HE HAS HIS OWN GREETING LINE LIKE YOU LINE LIKE YOU >> I WANT TO BE REALLY CLEAR >> I WANT TO BE REALLY CLEAR ABOUT THIS, ARI ABOUT THIS, ARI IT IS NOT A COMPETITION

IT IS NOT A COMPETITION >> NO >> NO >> I SAY THIS BECAUSE I >> I SAY THIS BECAUSE I DEFINITELY DO NOT WANT TO BE IN DEFINITELY DO NOT WANT TO BE IN COMPETITION WITH A 10-MONTH-OLD COMPETITION WITH A 10-MONTH-OLD GOLDEN RETRIEVER GOLDEN RETRIEVER

>> I’VE SEEN HIM >> I’VE SEEN HIM I’M A DOG PERSON MYSELF I’M A DOG PERSON MYSELF I’M SURE HE COULD GET A LOT OF I’M SURE HE COULD GET A LOT OF INDIVIDUAL DONORS AS WELL

INDIVIDUAL DONORS AS WELL IF HE GOES IN THAT DIRECTION IF HE GOES IN THAT DIRECTION SENATOR WARREN, COMING HERE ON

Source: Youtube

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar