Hit enter after type your search item

Here you will find everything about smart and technology

Pixel 4 vs. iPhone 11 Pro – wer hat die beste Smartphone Kamera? (ausführlicher Test)


Welcome to my channel here, Google Pixel 4 and iPhone 11 Pro Currently the top smartphones with the best Cameras in the market In this video I want the picture quality between the two models in detail compare with each other and find out if a winner can be determined

Have fun (Music) All pictures were taken here in automatic mode shot with the new software version So that means iOS 132 with Deep Fusion against Android 10 Stand November 2019 The best quality goes best in the fullscreen mode, but you can find it too Below in the video description a download link with which you can download pictures – and without any registration Let me start with the hardware: Both smartphones have on the back a normal wide-angle camera and a 2 compartment Zoom

The iPhone 11 Pro is still a third camera, an ultra wide angle But since the normal wide-angle main cameras the optically highest quality are, in addition significantly more light on the sensor and thus especially in difficult lighting conditions I got the better results simplicity determined mainly to compare these with each other Because the iPhone 11 the same main camera as the pro models got even became made some pictures with it The other focal lengths but I will of course in my detailed reviews of the devices to treat – so leave a subscription there

With this picture I want the quality the lenses point, with regard to distortion and the sharpness If you look at the bottom, you see at the pixel here maybe a slight barrel distortion and with the iPhone, that too falls with one Location stones more the field of view a bit bigger is 300% zoomed in we can see the centers here Sharpness and can judge how detailed depict the lenses At the same resolution can you get a bit more structure at the pixel here, especially in the joints Let's take a look at the edge sharpness, see there Of course you usually the quality decreases and so I would not make any differences here can make out

There are clear differences in the minimum focus distance, here is the iPhone clear the nose and produce the sharper Image showing pixel in the camera app though least if you are too close to an object ran (Music) Let's get to the everyday situations with simple light Here we have a typical picture for the both smartphones Left the pixel, something darker and more contrasty In addition, the iPhone a bit brighter and flatter

In good light conditions are the details then both smartphones are quite comparable, although here this increase in contrast in the Face at the pixel does not look so natural These are typical differences in look to find in many shots in which the Pixel is usually a bit more contrasty, but also highlights the saturation of the color easily As always, exceptions confirm the rule But to make it clearer, what to do the image processing of the individual manufacturers so, I have an error chain considered, in which this effect adds up Both devices must first and take the same picture from a monitor

Then get in the next pass though her previously photographed image displayed again from which you then take another picture have to This is what the original picture looked like – and here are the results from the 1 Run — and these are the results from the 2

Run Pretty shocking how strong the pictures over edited and defaced Especially at the pixel I notice how clumsy you just lift the contrast and neat the picture overshadowed By contrast, while the iPhone is saturated way too exaggerated, the picture includes but ultimately much more information in brightness shades and fine details in the hair This is how the picture can be reduced by reducing it save satiety quite well

Unlike the pixel here is information in shadow areas and just easy Lost, who did not get through to bring back the lightening of the shadows to let That's exactly why cameras come in should produce natural picture, the Look is done after the photo and not directly from in the camera Then we come to the dynamic range in extreme against light situations, here has the pixel unfortunately a small vulnerability You can see it in bright areas here in the sun less details emerges But more dramatic is the fact that the pixel has problems in the shadows to lighten up what situations like that in a clear opposite to the iPhone Picture noise makes noticeable

This behavior is also reliable reproduce and is also in video recordings (which I will come to shortly) Hopefully here will be an update Refilled by Google The nose in front clearly has the pixel for it in edge detection in portrait mode, So here where the background is out of focus becomes The iPhone is often very inaccurate here, especially with everything that is not a person A pity is that the pixel is obvious unreasonably 1

4 subject zoomed in and then not the telecamera uses, but continue with the wide angle snaps Even if you manually zoom in 2x tray Curiously, the pixel continues to use the pixel the main camera and does not jump (like that iphone 11 Pro) on the telecamera With so much digital zoom is natural then a loss of quality visible Especially difficult for all smartphones, It will be in the evening or in buildings with artificial light if less light to available Here you can see in front of everyone the difference to cheaper devices clear

These two pictures show again the typical characteristics of the two devices The pixel is a bit dark and colder, The iPhone is not afraid of a stronger one HDR effect and to lighten shadows a bit But has – typically a warmer White balance Hm, you saw it in the headmaster The apartment Although warm and comfortably lit, however the iPhone is too yellow for me, the pixel again too cold and makes the mood a bit broken

Due to the brighter lighting I find the iPhone here a little better In the details are the smartphones then again extremely close to each other and Do not take much in the end Due to the strong HDR effect of the iPhone was However, the pants brightened so funny here which I am in direct comparison at the pixel more beautiful find Also in this picture you can see that the iPhone I like to stop things that are dark or higher contrast (just like the pixel power) just look better in this case Shortly a word about LED lights, here is I noticed that at the pixel the white balance something unsure and then sometimes completely next to it lies

Also, the pictures appear in direct LED light also a bit flat, with lower local contrasts opposite the iPhone Let's get to the night mode, there is a whole legendary wise already While in the pixel devices and now has too Apple followed suit The pixel tends to be brighter here Pictures and can inspire one in the one Things you can not see with the naked eye can recognize more By contrast, the photos of the iPhone are a bit darker and more like the way you perceive it The stronger lightening costs the pixel but also by a usually longer exposure time and tends to have stronger noise reduction

If you look, for example, the stones are less less structure to recognize Or down here the Sparkassen sign #not sponsored And also in the asphalt you can see a stronger one Blur In addition, the night mode turns on the iPhone easy automatically while at the Pixel is a separate fashion As a result, the iPhone also uses in less dark environments the night mode (with 1 sec) exposure time and reached so, better quality over that pixel what still in the normal camera mode located

New is the possibility of astrophotography, when the device is on a tripod You can do ultra long exposures over several Record minutes Although the results could not be of the Stool, decide yourself, maybe it is also because that I for star photography just use different equipment Interestingly, Google as opposed to Apple the night mode also with the selfie camera allows, the iPhone can only be here with brighten the display Generally I have to say that the front camera at the pixel in low light conditions makes better recordings and also one piece is weitwinkliger By day, I like the iPhone better, because here the skin tones are more realistic and not so drifting into the red / or supersaturated

Let's get to the video mode, where the iPhone at least from the technical data all smartphones in the market in the shadows provides Here you can see all cameras (ie inclusive the selfie cam) 4K video in 24, 30 and 60 record fps In contrast, the pixel has some Limits, the selfie camera can maximally full HD in 30 FPS, and the back cameras can 4k exclusively in 30 fps In addition, the iPhone is capable with appropriate Apps two video streams of different cameras to record at the same time, although then clearly to the burden of quality goes With video stabilization enabled, cropt the pixel almost 1

3 tray over the photo mode into the picture, what a pity there you are anyway has no wide angle and thus still less trapping Unlike the iPhone, here are all cameras almost a full sensor readout with minimal Crop (apart from the 16: 9 format) So one could expect stabilization the pixel has more room Basically, both phones can very good balance jolts and tremors Nevertheless, stabilization seems to me from the iPhone then a tick soft, because the pixel sometimes small jerks in it Has

It's the same with picture quality, Here Apple is simple with their HEVC video codec superior to the competition It is above all the whole package of colors, White balance, exposure and a higher Dynamic range that the videos a bit natural and looks more brilliant Who wants to see what you at Chinematic Can beat footage from the iPhone, looks you like my other video on it link Come down to the description and to the end of the video

Source: Youtube

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar
Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views :